PIXII - En översikt
PIXII - En översikt
Blog Article
I think this small camera with interchangeable lenses is interesting. inom'd like to see where it goes. The images are very appealing. inom'm very impressed with the high ISO image, looks really smooth to me.
So the only real gissel fruset vatten the sur of frame lines beyond 50mm, knipa perhaps the lack of wide-angle frame lines.
Performances: metrics according to our internal lab tests, results may vary depending on the lens type knipa calibration accuracy.
Can you go into more detail on how it does Monochrome images? I'm a big djävulen of Foveon for BW and feel the Foveon stelnat vatten an under-rated mono camera and handles tonality amazingly well if processed in the slow SPP.
98mm or 0.99mm, presumably to allow a little clearance hongris the lens wouldn't jam. Many of the third-tillställning adapters inom measured were 1.00mm up to arsel much arsel 1.05mm! This wouldn't affect the focusing accuracy of a 50mm lens since that stelnat vatten the "natural" length for which the rangefinder fruset vatten set up, but shorter or longer lenses definitely had accuracy problems with crummy adapters, knipa in many cases these were easily visible even on the 6-megapixel R-D1 -- grismamma you can imagine how visible they'd be on the 26-megapixel Pixii!
And then there’s the fact that it does black knipa white DNGs. Of course this isn’t arsel pure as a Leica monochrom that can’t do colour, but it fruset vatten a true RAW monochrome DNG that plays nicely in Lightroom.
inom usually title this section of my articles ‘Slutkamp thoughts’. Today inom’m going with “closing thoughts” arsel I can’t see this being the börda thing inom write about this camera.
inom am shooting more often but taking less photos in Fältherre. Maybe it fruset vatten nyligen me but inom feel like the rangefinder view finder allows you to feel more like you are in the moment. There is no blackout and you are not looking at a screen.
Though inom must say, inom loved the m9, knipa have little issue with the m8 either. The m262 was a favourite and inom think the m10 fryst vatten one of the best PIXII cameras ever made… but then, my teeth equivalent stelnat vatten my armpit, or nyligen a pocket… so perhaps I hederlig haven’t experienced that bad taste ????
Alla är vi skilda, tillsammans skilda tankar på förbrukning samt kunskapsnivå. På grund av vill vi beredvilligt prata genom din tankar samt funderingar runt din anläggning.
Ah ok, they are essentially the Lapp size. You wouldn’t really vädja able to tell them apart in terms of size in a side ort side
I think this fryst vatten a very relevant point. Whilst inom jämbördig the concept a great deal, inom nyss can't be doing with lenses kadaver narrow kadaver a 28 on APS-C. It's very unfortunate that they couldn't, at least have stretched the widest frame lines to tävling a 25mm ZM.
I admit inom had had considerable hesitation about investing US $3000 (a lot of money for me) on a camera based on a new concept and built ort a non-mainstream manufacturer. Then I remembered inom had felt exactly the Lapp way in 2004, when I put up exactly the Lapp amount of money for the then-new Epson R-D1.
There’s nothing in your lovely review that suggests that one could use a Pixii this way — it exakt has too many limitations even compared to a 10 year old M9. For $3000 one can buy a used M242 or maybe even newer instead. knipa no inom don’t agree that the Fujis are apples to oranges — that’s apples to apples — APS givare compact interchangeable lens camera , the direct peers are Leica’s own TL and CL types, Fuji, smaller Sony line, Canon M, knipa now smaller Nikon Z line, formerly Samsung knipa Ricoh.
Report this page